At Colorado Divorce Law Group, we know how important it is to spend time with your children. We also know how critical a safe and supportive environment can be to a child’s development. We have helped countless parents resolve their child custody issues. No matter what your situation is, we look forward to taking your call. Reach out to our office in Littleton today by calling (720) 593-6442 so that we can schedule a consultation.
A history of domestic violence on the part of either parent can sometimes affect the outcome of a child custody case. Colorado courts make child custody decisions based on the “best interests of the child” standard, so if there is a concern that one parent may not provide their child or children with a safe environment, then courts may limit parenting time or impose specific rules for supervised visitation. The exact impacts of domestic violence on child custody will depend on factors such as how frequent the abuse was, over what time period, and whether the violence was ever directed at the children themselves. If both parents have a history of abusive behavior, that background may also play a role.
In Colorado, a history of domestic violence can significantly affect child custody determinations because courts must apply the “best interests of the child” standard under Colorado Revised Statutes § 14-10-124, and safety concerns may limit parenting time or decision-making authority.
Colorado Divorce Law Group, based in Littleton, Colorado, assists individuals throughout the state with child custody and parenting time matters involving allegations or histories of domestic violence.
C.R.S. § 14-10-124(1.5) requires any magistrate or judge deciding a child custody case in Colorado to make their determinations for both parenting time and decision-making responsibility in accordance with the “best interests of the child.” To assist courts in the application of this requirement, the Colorado legislature has enumerated a series of factors the court must consider for parenting time. For decision-making responsibility, courts begin from that established set of factors and add some additional considerations. The use of two “staggered” lists reflects the fact that not all parental obligations rely on the same skills or abilities.
In determining how to divide a child’s time between parental households, the court must consider the following:
If this list of factors seems intimidating, it is partly because Colorado courts recognize just how difficult and demanding it is to be a parent. Both judges and magistrates generally aim to ensure that children spend time in environments that are not only physically safe but also conducive to their emotional and psychological growth.
Under C.R.S. § 14-10-124(1.5)(b), Colorado courts begin their assessment of the child’s best interests with the factors they are legally obligated to consider in parenting time decisions, and they add to those factors the following statutorily mandated factors for determining awards of decision-making responsibility:
Importantly, whenever there is reason to believe that a child may have been conceived as the result of domestic violence, sexual assault, or the neglect or abuse of a child, the court is obligated to extend its consideration beyond these factors to a further set constructed specifically to help protect against continued or repeated instances of domestic violence or other abuse.
When either party is shown to have committed any act of domestic violence, or to have engaged in a pattern of domestic violence (i.e., repeated domestic violence incidents), or to have a personal history of domestic violence, then the court is required not to consider shared parental decision-making to be in the best interests of the child whenever there is an objection by either the child’s other parent or a legal representative appointed for the child except under specific circumstances. These circumstances may be broken down into essentially three components:
Joint decision-making responsibility is not necessarily an impossible outcome in family dynamics that have been shaped by domestic violence, but it can be significantly harder to achieve than in cases without that complication. Where there is evidence that one parent has abused the other, but not that either parent has abused the child, then shared decision-making may even be more difficult to achieve than shared parenting time responsibilities. An experienced child custody lawyer with Colorado Divorce Law Group may be able to help you weigh your options, whether you are seeking to recover after making mistakes and long for a relationship with your child, or on the other hand, are concerned about the possibility of being forced to continually negotiate consequential decisions for your child’s future with an abusive and potentially violent ex.
When a court’s review of the facts finds that a preponderance of the evidence (the standard of proof typically used in civil trials) shows a child to have been conceived through an act of sexual assault against one parent by the child’s other parent, then the law applies a “rebuttable” presumption that it will not be in the child’s best interests for the parent who committed the assault to have sole or shared decision-making “with respect to any issue.” The “rebuttable” qualifier means that the parent who has been found to have committed the assault has an opportunity to present evidence to support a contrary position; it means that the presumption can be overcome, but the burden for overcoming it can be expected to rest with the parent the court has found to have committed assault against the child’s other parent.
Whenever either parent has been shown, by a preponderance of the evidence, to have committed any act of child abuse or child neglect, then the court is precluded from awarding mutual decision-making in the presence of an objection from either the other parent of the child or from the child’s own legal representative (i.e., a court-appointed guardian ad litem, sometimes called a GAL).
Domestic violence can have harmful impacts not only in the moments after a specific instance of abuse, but in the months and years that follow. Particularly where there are patterns of repeated domestic violence, courts may be reluctant to make child custody arrangements that leave a vulnerable child with a parent who may not keep them safe. Courts also have to take into consideration the safety of survivors of domestic violence who have left abusive situations, and victims of sexual assault whose attackers are now the other parent of their child.
Given all of the complexities involved and the many different shapes a case may take, when your child custody case is complicated by a history of domestic violence, it makes sense to get advice and perspective from an experienced attorney in your area. Call (720) 593-6442 to schedule a consultation with Colorado Divorce Law Group. Our conversation will be completely confidential, so you can feel secure in asking the potentially sensitive questions that may be on your mind.
Listed below are several helpful frequently asked questions about child custody and domestic abuse in Colorado.
Colorado courts evaluate domestic violence as part of the best interests of the child analysis under Colorado law. A documented history of abuse may result in limited parenting time, supervised visitation, or restrictions on shared decision-making authority. The court focuses on the safety and well-being of the child and the abused parent.
Under Colorado Revised Statutes § 14-10-124, judges and magistrates must base parenting time and decision-making responsibility on the child’s best interests. The statute outlines specific factors, including the child’s adjustment to home and school, the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, and any credible evidence of domestic violence. Courts weigh these factors to create arrangements that promote stability and safety.
Courts consider the child’s wishes, when appropriate, as well as each parent’s wishes and prior involvement in the child’s life. Judges also evaluate the ability of each parent to encourage a positive relationship between the child and the other parent, the physical distance between households, and the child’s existing relationships with siblings and other significant individuals. Any history of domestic violence plays a central role in the analysis.
Parenting time addresses where the child lives and how time is divided between households, while decision-making responsibility concerns authority over major issues such as education, medical care, and religious upbringing. Courts begin with the parenting time factors and add statutory considerations related to cooperation and the ability to make joint decisions. Domestic violence allegations may make shared decision-making more difficult to obtain.
Yes. When credible evidence shows that a parent has committed domestic violence, courts may determine that shared decision-making is not in the child’s best interests, especially if the other parent or the child’s legal representative objects. Courts must also find that any shared arrangement would be safe and that the parties can cooperate effectively before approving joint authority.
If a court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that a child was conceived through sexual assault, the law creates a rebuttable presumption against awarding sole or shared decision-making to the parent found to have committed the assault. This presumption may be challenged, but the burden rests on that parent to present evidence supporting a different outcome. The court’s primary concern remains the safety and well-being of the child and the abused parent.
When a parent has committed child abuse or neglect, Colorado law limits the court’s ability to award mutual decision-making if the other parent or a guardian ad litem objects. Judges must prioritize the child’s safety and long-term welfare. Such findings can significantly influence both parenting time and decision-making determinations.
Child custody cases involving domestic violence often require careful analysis of statutory factors, evidentiary standards, and safety considerations. Attorneys at Colorado Divorce Law Group could help clarify available legal options, explain how Colorado courts apply the best interests standard, and work to ensure clients understand their rights and potential legal paths. Consider visiting with an experienced attorney at Colorado Divorce Law Group to learn more about your legal options.